This information is dedicated to PIP victims and is not meant to apply to other types of cosmetic surgery of which there are many and each has its own associated complexity. It would be reasonable to assume that the breast implant scandal with PIP is straight forward considering that the information widely publicized about the toxic silicone.

What makes these claims different is that the manufacturers of PIP are a company that was registered in France and is no longer trading, the company director has criminal charges against him, and the insurance that he had for the company is not available due to the breach of the terms of the policy. So in terms of who is at fault the obvious possible first choice being the manufacturer is not an option.

The responsibility for the use of these implants does not lie exclusively with the manufacturer as they were significant but did not work alone. There are also the distributors who we know to be a company called Cloverleaf, and the clinics and the surgeons all of whom played a part in this. It is the level of involvement and responsibility that they each had which is the subject of debate and legal investigations and this is what distinguishes this from other claims for cosmetic surgery.

It would also be reasonable for you to assume these claims are medical or clinical negligence due to the procedure but that is not the legal case. The legal case is that these claims are likely to be consumer claims in the same way that you are protected if you purchase a faulty product although the product was implanted into your body by surgery it is still a product.

That is not to rule out completely an element of medical negligence because this may be a factor.

Therefore if these are to be presented as consumer claims part of the evidence will be the actual contract with the clinic or surgeon who supplied you or carried out the surgery. This is why we are asking those who seek our help for copies of any documents that they have regarding the original brochure from the clinic offering the treatment to the final payment or fee for after care.

Please think back carefully to when you first decided to have this treatment and it may be worthwhile writing notes about this to help your recollection. We will be asking you for a timeline of sorts to confirm:

When you decided to have the surgery

How you went about choosing the clinic and/or surgeon

What advertising material did you review or rely on for your choice

What were the payment arrangements?

What did the clinic require of you before the procedure took place e.g. were there meetings with the surgeon in advance, were your medical records reviewed, were you examined and did you fill in an information sheet about your health and any medication or ailments.

Background information

The silicone breast implants were made by the French company Poly Implant Prothese (PIP) and banned in 2010. We are not certain of the date when they were first manufactured but this was around 2000-2003.

The product was banned due to the identification that the implants were not the safe medical silicone but rather industrial grade.

What is silicone implant rupture?

This is when the implant splits and releases the silicone gel. The split can either be a large tear or a small split which would be hardly noticeable and this is the main problem for most women. Yog hais tias lub cais yog cuab kev lawv yuav tau lub npe hu muaj ib qho teeb meem ntxov tab sis vim hais tias muaj ntau yam muaj ib tug me me kua muag nyob qhov twg cov silicone yog seeping tawm nws yog tsis cuab.

Cov tshwm sim ntawm lub cais yuav ua rau muaj ntau yam teeb meem xws li caws pliav nqaij, wrinkling ntawm daim tawv nqaij, kev hloov ntawm lub cev, mob, xws li loog loog rau lub npe tiam sis ob peb.

Yuav ua li cas yog lub ntiaj teb no teev?

Tsis ntev los no kwv yees muab tag nrho cov ntawm 300,000 kev cog hniav nyob rau hauv 65 lub teb chaws mus muab rau koj ib tug hais txog ntawm lub loj heev teev ntawm qhov teeb meem no nrog kwv yees li 40,000 cov poj niam nyob rau hauv lub UK. tsuas yog 5% or so of the implants were used by the NHS.

Advice about removal?

There is no consensus and it appears to be where you live that is the answer. So if you reside in Wales, France, Germany, it is yes.

If you live in England, Scotland and Northern Ireland the answer is that it is not necessary unless you have confirmation that you have a rupture.

What is Compensation?

Compensation usually falls under two categories: 1) the pain, suffering and loss of amenity which means the physical and psychological injury; thiab 2) tej nyiaj txiag losses uas yuav tus nqi ntawm cov thawj kev phais thiab tej yam ntxiv kev kho mob cov nqi, mus ncig teb chaws cov nuj nqis, lub sij hawm tawm hauj lwm, tshuaj, thiab lwm yam ....

 

Yog vim li cas tej zaum yuav kuv yuav tsum tau raws li txoj cai lub tswv yim?

peb, raws li koj yuav tau txais, recommend that you seek legal assistance because of the complexities referred to above but more importantly to protect your claim. Many women have already registered their potential claim and many more are continuing to do so. Lub npe ntawm lawv cov lus secures lawv qhov chaw nyob rau hauv daim ntawv thov uas yog tam sim no yog formulated tiv thaiv ob peb neeg raug foob txoj kev them nyiaj. Yog tsis muaj sijhawm sau npe tsis tau, tiam sis nws yog yuav koj yuav tsum tau ua li ntawd los ntawm tus kawg ntawm Lub Xya hli ntuj thaum cov theem kawg rau npe yog vim yuav tsum tau ua kom tiav. Qhov no hnub tej zaum yuav ncua tab sis raws li ib tug yuam peb yuav hais tias koj ua hauj lwm ntawm hnub.

Yuav tsum tau koj yuav tsum thawj raws li txoj cai cov tswv yim rau tej yam ntawm thov nyiaj rau niaj phais negligence ces hu rau peb hnub no li ntawd tej zaum peb yuav muab koj cov ntsiab lus thiab koj mus rau peb daim ntawv teev.